The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted this week to rescind the most recent version of its workplace harassment guidance, which included examples based on gender identity and sexual orientation.

As NPR reports, the commission voted 2-to-1 on Thursday to rescind the guidance, with EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas and commissioner Brittany Panuccio, both Trump appointees, voting against Commissioner Kalpana Kotagal, the commission’s only Democrat.

Related

Under Trump, federal workplace anti-discrimination agency engaged in… workplace discrimination

The guidance, approved in 2024 under the Biden administration, cited the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which established that workplace discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation is a form of sex-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It included examples of unlawful workplace discrimination involving intentional misuse of pronouns that do not align with an employee’s gender identity and denial of access to restrooms that align with an employee’s gender identity.

As NPR notes, Lucas, who was an EEOC commissioner at the time, voted against the guidance, writing in her dissent that “Biological sex is real, and it matters. Sex is binary (male and female) and is immutable,” and that “It is not harassment to acknowledge these truths — or to use language like pronouns that flow from these realities, even repeatedly.”

Never Miss a Beat

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

President Donald Trump named Lucas the EEOC’s acting chair last January, after firing two Democratic commissioners and the agency’s general counsel. Lucas opposes both DEI initiatives and federal civil rights protections for transgender people and has said that her priorities include “rooting out unlawful DEI-motivated race and sex discrimination.”

Following Trump’s January 2025 executive order declaring that the U.S. government would only recognize an individual’s sex as determined by their “immutable biological classification as either male or female,” Lucas stated that while the agency would continue accepting all discrimination charges filed by workers, complaints that “implicate” the anti-trans executive order would be elevated to headquarters for review. After reportedly burying a number of lawsuits involving discrimination against trans and nonbinary workers, the EEOC moved in July to resume processing complaints that “fall squarely” under legal precedent set by Bostock.

In May 2025, a federal judge ruled that the EEOC had exceeded its authority with the updated 2024 guidance, vacating the section related to anti-LGBTQ+ workplace harassment.

As NPR notes, neither that decision nor the rescission of the guidance changes anything about federal laws protecting LGBTQ+ workers from discrimination in the workplace. But it does remove a key resource for employers who rely on the EEOC for guidance on what constitutes unlawful harassment.

“There’s no reason to rescind the harassment guidance in its entirety,” Kotagal said on Thursday, according to NPR. “Instead of adopting a thoughtful and surgical approach to excise the sections the majority disagrees with or suggest an alternative, the commission is throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Worse, it is doing so without public input.”

Kotagal was likely referring to the fact that Thursday’s vote came without the usual 30-day notice and comment period.

While Lucas asserted Thursday that the EEOC would continue to pursue cases of “unlawful harassment,” both former EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows — who was fired by Trump last year — and Craig Leen, a partner with the employment law firm K&L Gates, noted that the rescission of the EEOC guidance leaves employers in the dark about how to approach issues of harassment.

“There is no public transparency as to how the commission is going to look at these issues, some of which can be quite complicated,” Burrows told NPR.

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

I never wanted to be a pastor. 

Yes, I know it may seem almost sacrilegious for a pastor and faith leader in the Christian tradition to admit. But it’s true. I never desired or sought after the title, even though I knew that someday I would be one. And even though I have been resistant to the idea, one thing I cannot deny – that I’ve been coming to grips with for the last year or so – is that I do have a pastor’s heart. And it is that pastor’s heart that sets the tone for my book, Faith Deconstruction For Dummies. 

Related

“We deserve wrinkles”: The fight for trans youth is a fight for a future with trans elders in it

Much of my care is informed by my own experiences. My care is also informed by my years of faith leadership, including my time as the senior pastor of a small, non-denominational, Pentecostal-leaning ministry in the suburbs of Atlanta, Georgia. 

I enrolled in the Master of Divinity program at the Candler School of Theology at Emory University for two reasons. First, I had very real questions about what I’d been taught from the Jesus story in its entirety. The second reason was that I needed to prove to those who claimed they saw something in me that I hadn’t quite seen in myself – a call to ministry – that they were wrong. 

Never Miss a Beat

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

And by extension, I enrolled to prove God wrong. 

How could someone like me, a same-gender-loving Black cisgender male from the South, be called to do ministry? My very presence, as far as the church universal was concerned, was an abomination. What claim did I have to profess the good news of Jesus Christ in anyone’s pulpit? It didn’t help that someone dear once told me God didn’t hear my prayers. 

I carried that declaration with me for a long time. 

I left the church of my upbringing – the very place where my great aunt served as church secretary and my grandfather (and eventually my father) were eulogized – because I knew it wouldn’t be a safe space for me emotionally, spiritually, or culturally. Like Hagar, the Egyptian servant to Abraham’s wife, Sarah, I decided to take my chances in the wilderness rather than stay in a space that denied my humanity. But eventually, I returned to church and over the course of nearly a decade, became determined enough to boldly engage the questions I had about Jesus, God, faith, and the church universal. 

When I declared publicly that I believed Jesus’ humanity was more important than his divinity, I was encouraged to “go to seminary.”

Faith Deconstruction For Dummies is informed by my own deconstruction journey. It is also informed by my care for people and my understanding of the power and dangers of harmful theology rooted in Christian nationalism and fundamentalism, a theology that has historically run rampant in many of our churches, whether or not they claim to be affirming. 

What is faith deconstruction? It depends on who you ask. For me, it is the process of thinking critically about what you believe. In the book, I describe it this way: “For some, faith deconstruction is a critical examination of their faith and theology. Some deconstructionists describe faith deconstructing as weeding. When one deconstructs their faith, they take a deep look at not just their faith, but the influences of their faith understanding.”

Faith deconstruction isn’t anything new. For generations, there have been those whose work centered around pushing back against the harms of religious abuse, manipulation, indoctrination, and persecution, asking questions and providing a different perspective than what we’ve been conditioned to believe. In faith deconstruction, one re-examines the lessons, doctrines, traditions, and harmful theology they’ve been subjected to.

What I bring to the discourse is a lifetime of firsthand experience with harmful theology, and also the knowledge and awareness that religion isn’t all bad. It’s the people who have made it so harmful.  

And yes, there are those who deconstruct and completely denounce or walk away from the faith practice of their origin. But that’s not the case for everyone. For some, their faith is strengthened because of their deconstruction. It just depends on what weight and value you place on what you believe. Faith Deconstruction For Dummies is not an attempt on my part to take anyone’s faith from them. I made my intent clear when I was approached to do this book, and that’s still true today. People’s faith is near to them. People are sensitive about their faith. I honor that.

Faith Deconstruction For Dummies provides readers with suggestions for approaching their deconstruction journey, creates space for their questions, and offers a guide to assist them in their deconstruction and the process of deconstructing their faith. It also allows those often overlooked in certain conversations regarding deconstruction to see themselves in the pages because it’s written from the perspective of a Black, same-gender-loving, cisgender male preacher, born and raised in the South with extensive theological training. 

I’m simply trying to give people permission to do the things they haven’t been allowed to do: ask questions, investigate, and determine for themselves what they consider not just truth, but purpose. The rest of it is up to you and whatever or whoever you consider to be the divine. 

The Rev. Dr. Mashaun D. Simon (he/him/they) is a preacher/public speaker, award-winning journalist, author, lecturer, and thought leader. A native of metro Atlanta, he seeks to curate authentic spaces of belonging and empower others to achieve personal freedom and fulfillment. His book, Faith Deconstruction For Dummies, is available wherever books are sold. 

 

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

Lawyers for the family of Renee Good, the unarmed woman fatally shot by ICE officer Jonathan Ross two weeks ago in Minneapolis, released the results of a private autopsy on Wednesday evening that showed she died of a gunshot wound to the head.

Four bullets in total struck Good, the autopsy revealed.

Related

Karoline Leavitt loses it & berates reporter for asking about Renee Good shooting

The fatal shot entered Good’s head near her left temple and exited through the right side, consistent with Ross shooting Good from the left side of her vehicle at point-blank range. A second shot pierced Good’s left forearm, and a third hit her right breast but didn’t enter her torso.

A fourth gunshot grazed her body in an unidentified location.

The lawyers declined to release the full report, but said they would continue “to gather evidence” in connection with the shooting as it pursued what it said was a civil investigation, The New York Times reported.

Never Miss a Beat

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

“We believe the evidence we are gathering and will continue to gather in our investigation will suffice to prove our case,” lead attorney Antonio M. Romanucci said in a statement. “The video evidence depicting the events of January 7, 2026, is clear, particularly when viewed through the standards of reasonable policing and totality of circumstances.”

The private report precedes the results from the Hennepin County medical examiner’s office autopsy of Good’s body.

The FBI is investigating the shooting, while state officials say they’ve been barred from participating in the probe. Six federal prosecutors resigned in protest over the decision.

Good leaves behind her wife, Becca Good, and three children.

The private autopsy results add to the information reported by first responders attending Good at the scene, and 911 calls in the aftermath of the fatal shooting.

911 transcripts reveal the first call came in at 9:38 a.m., about one minute after the shots were fired, the Guardian reported.

One caller told dispatch there were “a bunch of ICE agents on 33rd and Portland, they just shot a lady point-blank range in her car.”

When asked if the woman had been shot, the caller responded: “She’s f*ckin’ dead. They f*ckin’ shot her.”

Incident reports show paramedics arrived at the chaotic scene approximately four minutes later and found Good “unresponsive” in the driver’s seat of her car “with blood on her face and torso.”

Paramedics removed Good from her vehicle and described her as “unresponsive, not breathing, with inconsistent, irregular, thready pulse activity.”

The responders identified two “apparent gunshot wounds” to the right side of her chest, another apparent gunshot wound “to the patient’s left forearm,” and a “possible gunshot wound with protruding tissue on the left side of the patient’s head,” the report details.

They also noted she had “dilated pupils” and blood “discharging” from her left ear.

Paramedics moved Good down the block “for a more workable scene, better access for ambulances, and separation from an escalating scene involving law enforcement and bystanders.”

Responders began performing chest compressions and applied a tourniquet to Good’s left arm before transporting her to a nearby hospital while continuing CPR.

At the hospital, staff “assumed airway and ventilation responsibilities.” The report concludes, “Resuscitative efforts were discontinued at approximately 10:30 am.”

Responding to the release of the private autopsy report on Wednesday evening, Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin continued to deny any culpability in Good’s death for the ICE officer who shot her. 

“If you impede law enforcement operations, ignore law commands, and use a deadly weapon to kill or cause bodily harm to a federal law enforcement officer there are dangerous, and in this case deadly, consequences,” McLaughlin said. “This was entirely preventable.”

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.