Vue lecture

Il y a de nouveaux articles disponibles, cliquez pour rafraîchir la page.

Trump nominated anti-LGBTQ+ Jan 6 protestor for US attorney. Senate Dems are sounding the alarm.

As chaos reigns in Minneapolis and in other ICE-infested cities across the country, the Trump administration has also not stopped grinding its repressive gears in its quest to dismantle pretty much every federal LGBTQ+ protection. Anti-LGBTQ+ hate group staffer Darin Smith is on track to become another cog in that machine.  

Smith has never tried a case, yet is on track to become the next U.S. Attorney for Wyoming, a role the Department of Justice describes as the state’s “principal litigator.” Despite his dearth of experience, it’s no surprise that Donald Trump nominated Smith, who is already serving as interim U.S. attorney in the state. He does, after all, possess a few qualifications that make him a perfect fit for America’s current commander-in-chief: He’s a diehard MAGA loyalist, he believes the Big Lie that the 2020 election was stolen (and even rallied outside the Capitol on January 6), and he vehemently opposes LGBTQ+ people’s rights.

Related

“Erasure is not neutral”: The inextricable link between LGBTQ+ rights & a functioning democracy

Insights for the LGBTQ+ community

Subscribe to our briefing for insights into how politics impacts the LGBTQ+ community and more.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

Until recently, Smith served as Director of Planned Giving and Foundations for the Family Research Council (FRC), an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group that declares on its website, “the only appropriate context for sexual relations is within the marriage of a man and a woman” and that “God created us ‘male and female.’”

In his Senate Questions for the Record, Smith confirmed to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) that he agrees with FRC’s opposition to same-sex marriage, as well as its stance that homosexuality is “harmful.” His answer affirming support for the organization’s positions on LGBTQ+ individuals implies he agrees with FRC’s positions that “sexual orientation can change” with conversion therapy, that LGBTQ+ identities “should never be specially protected categories under the law,” and that the Equality Act is “actually unequal, unfair, and unjust.”

A Trojan Horse

religious freedom hands tied prayer
| Shutterstock

Smith’s nomination – which Wyoming’s Republican senators have enthusiastically supported – has remained largely under the radar, but his likely confirmation is significant, a sign that loyalty to Trump is still the most important qualification.

It “certainly strikes me as something that the administration could try to use as precedential,” former federal prosecutor Michael Romano told Bloomberg.

Smith’s “background gives assurance only that he is politically aligned with, and will be loyal to, President Trump,” added Bruce Green, director of Fordham School of Law’s Louis Stein Center for Law and Ethics and a former federal prosecutor. “From the president’s perspective, that seems to be the only necessary qualification, and that’s good enough for Republicans in the Senate who will vote to confirm him.”

Sen. DURBIN: Trump’s U.S. Attorney nominee has never litigated a case. His only qualification is his absolute embrace of Trump’s 2020 election conspiracies. Yet, Senate Judiciary Republicans still voted to advance his nomination. pic.twitter.com/I9boQKLz2s

— Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryDems) January 23, 2026

Josh Sorbe, a spokesperson for U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats and Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), called Darin Smith an “anti-LGBTQ + extremist” with “no business serving as top law enforcement in any state – let alone a state with as much history of queer importance as Wyoming.”

Wyoming is the state where Matthew Shepard was killed at age 21 in a brutal anti-gay hate crime in October 1998. His murder brought attention to hate crime legislation at both the state and federal levels. President Barack Obama signed into federal law the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act in October 2009.

Smith advocates against the majority of legal protections for LGBTQ+ people.

In fact, he once called a proposed state LGBTQ+ employment discrimination law “a Trojan horse to legislate morality.”

In his responses to Durbin, he stood by those words, explaining that the bill “would have enshrined discrimination into law” by allowing “government officials and entities funded by taxpayers to elevate the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals over the rights of the rest of the population.”

During his mere seven months as a state senator in Wyoming, he sponsored a bill seeking to criminalize drag shows and persecute public and school librarians who “promote obscenity” to minors. The bill – which ultimately died in committee – was reportedly so vague that even Republicans spoke out against it.

He also co-sponsored an anti-trans bill to ban trans kids in public schools from using facilities that match their gender identities rather than their sex assigned at birth. It ultimately became law.

Despite affirmatively telling Durbin that he agrees with FRC’s stances on LGBTQ+ people, he responded more evasively to Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE). Coons asked if Smith agreed with FRC’s stances against trans identities, abortion, and queer families. Smith replied, “I will let the Family Research Council speak for themselves and decide their positions on these matters.”

He was equally evasive regarding questions on LGBTQ+ military service.

“I believe we should follow the law, and all people should be treated equally,” he wrote in response to Durbin’s question on whether LGBTQ+ people should be allowed to serve.

Durbin also asked if Smith believes the country is less safe with LGBTQ+ military members. Smith replied, “The focus must be on having the most effective military force possible.” Asked if LGBTQ+ military members generate less respect for the United States abroad, he replied, “I believe that it should be U.S. policy to have the most effective military force possible.”

Smith did say he does not think a business or government should be able to fire someone due to their LGBTQ+ identity. “However,” he clarified, “I do believe that churches and religious organizations have the Constitutional right to make employment decisions consistent with their religious beliefs and doctrines.”

What are we doing?

Insurrectionists loyal to President Donald Trump storm the US Capitol
Insurrectionists loyal to President Donald Trump storm the US Capitol | Shutterstock

On January 6, Smith joined the thousands of MAGA protestors who rallied to pressure lawmakers to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Donald Trump. While he did not storm the Capitol and claims he tried to stop folks around him from doing so, he has accused Capitol police officers of “massive incompetence,” saying their “impotent response” to the rioters allowed the chaos to take place.

“The people who protected us – he said were guilty of massive incompetence,” Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT) emphasized during a scathing speech against Smith. “I mean, seriously, what are we doing?”

In 2024, he even accused Capitol police and the FBI of baiting protestors into storming the Capitol.

“How can people get in the most secure building in the world?” Smith asked Cowboy State Daily. “It reeks of entrapment.” He also voiced support for pardoning all of the rioters.

Sorbe called Smith “an unqualified insurrectionist” whose “bigotry puts into serious question his commitment to upholding the law for all Americans.”

The Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he said, “will work to defeat his nomination.”

On the Senate questionnaire, Smith confirmed that he’s never argued before a jury, questioned a witness before a grand jury, or drafted a search warrant application. He confirmed he has no direct experience investigating violent crime, gun violence, drug trafficking, organized crime, corruption, or financial crimes. He’s never worked with crime victims, collaborated with law enforcement, or worked on issues related to juvenile justice.

But with a Republican Senate majority, Smith’s confirmation is almost guaranteed. 

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

GOP lawmakers are trying to sneak an anti-trans bathroom bill through without any hearings

Republican lawmakers in Kansas are trying to ram through an anti-trans bathroom ban by including it in a bill that previously only related to whether trans people could change their gender markers on their driver’s licenses.

As the Kansas Reflector reports, Republicans on the state’s House Judiciary Committee voted earlier this week to approve an amendment to House Bill 2426 introduced by Rep. Bob Lewis (R).

Related

Republicans launch investigation into Kansas school districts for not outing trans kids

In its original form, H.B. 2426 would have required Kansas driver’s licenses and birth certificates to indicate a person’s sex assigned at birth, regardless of their gender identity. That version of the bill was opposed by more than 200 people who showed up to a House Judiciary Committee meeting earlier this month, even though the bill only appeared on the committee’s agenda 24 hours before.

But prior to Monday night’s hearing, the committee gave no public notice that it would be taking action on the bill or that it would consider the bathroom ban, according to the Reflector.

Never Miss a Beat

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

Lewis’s amendment requires government buildings in the state to segregate spaces like bathrooms and locker rooms by sex and requires people to use only those facilities that align with their sex assigned at birth. It includes exceptions for unisex single occupancy restrooms and family changing rooms, and for situations in which medical attention is needed, for law enforcement, and for coaching — presumably allowing male coaches to enter women’s and girls’ locker rooms. Penalties for violations include a written notice for a first violation, up to a $1,000 fine for a second, and a misdemeanor criminal charge for a third. The amendment also allows individuals to bring private legal action against violators.

Democratic state Reps. John Carmichael, Lindsay Vaughn, and Dan Osman objected to the introduction of the amendment, with Vaughn questioning whether it was even germane to the original bill. But the bill’s sponsor and committee chair, state Rep. Susan Humphries (R), determined that it was germane to license and birth certificate requirements. When pushed to explain her reasoning, Humphries refused “to go into detail,” adding only that “it’s about sex, the definition of gender and sex.”

The committee’s Republican majority having voted in favor of the amendment, Humphries moved to place the contents of H.B. 2426 into an unrelated bill, S.B. 244, that had already been passed by the Senate. A legislative staffer explained during the hearing that this means the state Senate will not have a hearing on the anti-trans bill, according to the Reflector.

“This is an attempt to obfuscate what we’re doing here,” Carmichael told his fellow committee members. “If you’re in favor of a lack of transparency, if you’re in favor of taking bill numbers and playing them like a shell game, this is the amendment for you.” 

As the Reflector notes, the full state House and Senate still have to vote on S.B. 244 — which now contains the anti-trans provisions — and Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly (D) can still veto the bill.

During Monday’s hearing, Carmichael also noted that Kansas’s anti-LGBTQ+ Republican Attorney General Kris Kobach previously tried to use a 2023 state law that defined women by their sex assigned at birth to prevent trans people in the state from being allowed to correct the gender listed on their driver’s licenses and birth certificates. Kobach filed a lawsuit after Kelly continued to allow Kansans to update their documents. Last year, the state Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s decision in favor of Kobach, ruling that he had not shown that allowing trans people to change their documents causes any harm.

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

❌