Vue lecture

Il y a de nouveaux articles disponibles, cliquez pour rafraîchir la page.

Christian conservative leader rages at Presbyterian Church for honoring “obscene” Renee Good

Bill Donohue, president of the anti-LGBTQ+ hate group Catholic League, devoted almost 650 words on the group’s website to smearing Renee Nicole Good – the queer wife and mother who was fatally shot in the head by ICE agent Jonathan Ross while she was driving away from him.

Donahue called Good a “professional left-wing zealot who rejected every tenet of civil disobedience,” echoing the current administration’s repeated propaganda that anti-ICE protestors are paid “agitators.” He was reacting to a statement from the public policy arm of the Presbyterian Church, which compared Good to Martin Luther King Jr., saying her “life and death echo” his “same moral call.”

Related

ICE tore these husbands apart. Now a judge is demanding answers.

Donahue called the comparison “obscene” and said it “dishonored” King. He incorrectly claimed that Good “ran her car into an ICE agent,” despite video evidence proving otherwise.

“Renee Good was the complete antithesis of what King stood for,” Donahue ranted, claiming she “taunted, harassed and stalked” ICE agents and “trained others to do the same.”

Insights for the LGBTQ+ community

Subscribe to our briefing for insights into how politics impacts the LGBTQ+ community and more.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

Donahue then traced Good’s actions protesting ICE, denigrating her queer identity (calling her wife her “female lover”) and seeming to imply that she had it coming.

“Both carried whistles, the purpose of which was to alert illegal aliens that ICE agents were in the vicinity, thus obstructing the pursuit of justice,” he wrote. He then claimed that Ross had acted rationally in shooting Good as she drove away because he was traumatized from a previous incident where he had been dragged by a car.

“No one can blame him for not wanting to endure the same experience again, which explains why he acted so quickly to defend himself. Anyone in his shoes would have done the same.”

He also argued that Good was guilty of assault and battery.

“Renee Good’s blood is on the hands of the anti-ICE agitators,” he concluded. “They are itching for a confrontation, and they have no interest in following the nonviolent model of Martin Luther King. Indeed, they have more in common with violent street gangs than they do practitioners of King’s philosophy and activism.”

The Catholic League is vehemently anti-LGBTQ+, with posts on its site endlessly praising the president; claiming that trans inclusion is “the greatest child abuse scandal of our day”; and decrying “the queering of America” as “a culturally induced condition” that “serves no legitimate interest.”

Donahue’s denigration of Good is in line with the administration’s messaging on her death. Donald Trump often claims that liberal protestors are “professional agitators” to discredit them, not as a statement of fact. Last week, he accused Good herself of being one. He referred to her wife, Becca Good, as her “friend” and said that they were both “highly disrespectful of law enforcement.”

“They were harassing, they were following for days and for hours, and I think frankly, they were professional agitators. And I’d like to find out- We are going to find out who’s paying for it, with their brand-new signs and all their [inaudible],” Trump said. There is no reason to believe that the Goods were paid for anything related to what happened.

Trump also posted on Truth Social after the killing and called Good “very disorderly,” saying that she “viciously ran over the ICE Officer,” which contradicts multiple videos shot of the interaction.

Out Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN) has compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to Nazis. She is part of a small group of Congress members who plan to introduce an impeachment resolution against Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, who has called Good a “domestic terrorist.”

While DHS claims that ICE agents use aggressive tactics against people who stalk and obstruct their law enforcement activities, Craig said, “I don’t think any city in America, or any state in America has ever seen this type of lawless behavior by federal law enforcement.”

“Every American should be outraged. Every Minnesotan should be outraged, and at the same time, we should continue to peacefully protest what’s happening,” Craig told Cabrera. “I’ve never seen such an out-of-control agency.”



Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

Mike Johnson mocked for bragging about Trump being sleep deprived: “Not the own you think it is”

House Speaker Mike Johnson snapped at a reporter who asked about Donald Trump’s health, claiming the president works harder than anyone at the Capitol.

“The president mistakenly called Greenland Iceland, his speech is slurred, he’s got bruises on his hands. Are you at all worried about the president’s health or his decline at all?” the reporter asked Johnson.

Related

Democratic House members agree: Donald Trump is mentally unwell

Johnson didn’t hesitate. “Is this a serious question?” he barked. “This president sleeps about three hours a night. He outworks everybody in this building by a factor of two or three.”

Mike Johnson snapped when I asked him about Trump slurring his speech and him confusing Greenland and Iceland. “I cannot even believe you are asking me that question.” pic.twitter.com/rc1AeimCcW

— Eric Michael Garcia (@EricMGarcia) January 22, 2026

Some on social media suggested that even if the president is awake at all hours of the night, he is probably rage-posting on Truth Social rather than working.

They also mocked Johnson for thinking the lack of sleep is a brag when really it’s a concern.

Others pointed out that Johnson evaded actually answering the question, which may be an answer unto itself.

This president rage posts all night and falls asleep during scheduled events/meetings by day.

— jennifer plus 8 (@jenniferplus8) January 22, 2026

Really great question, thank you for asking it. His non answer says a lot

— The okayest poster there is (@ok_post_guy) January 22, 2026

"This geriatric man sleeps three hours a night" is not the "own" you think it is, Mike

— The Original Grinch (@baked_grinch) January 22, 2026

Sleeping about 3 hours per night is a bug, not a feature.

— Brian Guteking SZN (@packrfan4) January 22, 2026

…that's Johnson's defense? Or is that outburst confirming that we should know that something is definitely wrong by the fact that his sleeping patterns are off as well?

— Diana Rivera (@dianarivera481) January 22, 2026

Sleeping three hours a night is bad, not good. Not sure why every Trump lackey thinks that Trump being sleep deprived is a good thing.

— Camille MacKenzie (@CamRMacKenzie) January 22, 2026

If a 79 year old is sleeping 3 hours a night, that is a very, very serious concern.

— Carolina Adesso (@odessaphi52) January 22, 2026

So I heard a journalist ask a relevant and serious question, but what he got was an unserious lie as an answer.

— Done with this trash site ❎ (@TandaRacing) January 22, 2026

Also why is he only sleeping 3 hours a night? Perhaps he could sleep instead of golfing. Or tweeting.

— Carolina Adesso (@odessaphi52) January 22, 2026

Just sayin…an 80-year-old sleeping three hours a night is not a sign of great health and is particularly worrisome when other signs of dementia are present.

— Michaleen (@michaleen) January 22, 2026

What a load of bullshit! Since when is posting unhinged grievances and rubbish on X 100 + times during the night considered "working hard". https://t.co/DOHX3lqoSk

— Aure (@AureolinDay) January 22, 2026

“Totally heartbreaking”: Major Pride organization abruptly announces closure

The board of Tucson Pride in Arizona recently announced that it has not only cancelled the group’s upcoming Pride Festival but also is dissolving the entire organization amid financial challenges.

“This decision was not made lightly,” the board wrote in a statement on the Tucson Pride website. “We recognize the deep importance Tucson Pride has held in our community since 1977, serving as a space of visibility, advocacy, celebration, and resilience for nearly five decades. We are profoundly grateful to every volunteer, sponsor, artist, activist, and community member who has supported Tucson Pride throughout its history.”

Related

A small town is trying to ban Pride for the 3rd year in a row but organizers won’t back down

The note was brief and concluded by thanking the LGBTQ+ community and allies for “unwavering support, passion, and commitment over the years.” It did not explain why the board chose to shutter, but activists in the community told The Arizona Daily Star that Tucson Pride has struggled financially since former president Jimmy West was caught embezzling from the organization in 2017.

Events continued due to fundraising by impassioned supporters, but, according to Rick Morey-Wolfe, who has been involved with Tucson Pride since 2017, the current board has squandered money on things the community doesn’t want.

Never Miss a Beat

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
Subscribe to our Newsletter today

“The community has been very steadfast about not hiring high-end, expensive headliners and featuring local talent,” Morey-Wolfe said. “And for some reason, this specific group of people has continued to ignore that year after year, which has created debt year after year, and that’s pretty much the bottom line.”

Morey-Wolfe told the Daily Star he has cried multiple times since hearing about the organization’s closure. Local LGBTQ+ activist Scott Blades added he was “really surprised.”

The announcement of the closure on Facebook has garnered almost 700 comments. “Totally heartbreaking for the community!” someone said. “This visibility is so important.”

Many also communicated their anger at the board for giving up rather than figuring out how to reorganize or explaining to the community what the problems are so they can try to solve them. “I’m deeply disappointed and disgusted by this lack of candor and accountability!” one person wrote.

“The newly appointed Board owes the community an overview of their rationale for this decision,” another added, “especially given the history and longevity of the organization in our community (not to mention our national and global Pride history) as well as what will take its place going forward and when.”

Some folks, however, expressed excitement about the opportunity to build something stronger in its place.

“Let’s start a new organization,” one commenter declared. “Sometimes we have to allow things to go in order to make something bigger and better.”


Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

❌