Vue normale

Il y a de nouveaux articles disponibles, cliquez pour rafraîchir la page.
Aujourd’hui — 3 février 2026Flux principal

A Texas university just scrapped its women’s and gender studies course

3 février 2026 à 16:13

Texas A&M announced on Friday (30 January) that it will be eliminating its women’s and gender studies academic courses.

In a letter sent to faculty and staff obtained by KBTX, Provost and Executive Vice President Dr. Alan Sams said the decision was made “as part of the broader implementation of the recently updated Systems policy”.

He claimed that the Texas university “made the difficult decision to begin winding down the Women’s and Gender Studies (WGST) academic programs, including the BA, BS, Graduate Certificate and the Minor”, claiming it was due to “enrolment over the past several years”.

READ MORE: University professor banned from teaching about Plato over ‘sexuality’ rules

The program currently has 25 students seeking a major and 31 seeking a minor. Students already enrolled will be allowed to complete their programs over the next six semesters, but no new students will be accepted.

This comes after Texas A&M University System Board of Regents passed a policy last autumn restricting how race and gender could be discussed in class and ordered a sweeping review of course offerings.

It outlined that faculty may not advocate “race or gender ideology” or topics related to sexual orientation or gender identity unless a campus president grants a written exception for certain non-core or graduate-level courses that serve a necessary or educational purpose.

Share your thoughts! Let us know in the comments below, and remember to keep the conversation respectful.

The post A Texas university just scrapped its women’s and gender studies course appeared first on PinkNews | Latest lesbian, gay, bi and trans news | LGBTQ+ news.

An AI plush toy exposed thousands of private chats with children

3 février 2026 à 16:55

Bondu’s AI plush toy exposed a web console that let anyone with a Gmail account read about 50,000 private chats between children and their cuddly toys.

Bondu’s toy is marketed as:

“A soft, cuddly toy powered by AI that can chat, teach, and play with your child.”

What it doesn’t say is that anyone with a Gmail account could read the transcripts from virtually every child who used a Bondu toy. Without any actual hacking, simply by logging in with an arbitrary Google account, two researchers found themselves looking at children’s private conversations.

What Bondu has to say about safety does not mention security or privacy:

“Bondu’s safety and behavior systems were built over 18 months of beta testing with thousands of families. Thanks to rigorous review processes and continuous monitoring, we did not receive a single report of unsafe or inappropriate behavior from Bondu throughout the entire beta period.”

Bondu’s emphasis on successful beta testing is understandable. Remember the AI teddy bear marketed by FoloToy that quickly veered from friendly chat into sexual topics and unsafe household advice?

The researchers were stunned to find the company’s public-facing web console allowed anyone to log in with their Google account. The chat logs between children and their plushies revealed names, birth dates, family details, and intimate conversations. The only conversations not available were those manually deleted by parents or company staff.

Potentially, these chat logs could been a burglar’s or kidnapper’s dream, offering insight into household routines and upcoming events.

Bondu took the console offline within minutes of disclosure, then relaunched it with authentication. The CEO said fixes were completed within hours, they saw “no evidence” of other access, and they brought in a security firm and added monitoring.

In the past, we’ve pointed out that AI-powered stuffed animals may not be a good alternative for screen time. Critics warn that when a toy uses personalized, human‑like dialogue, it risks replacing aspects of the caregiver–child relationship. One Curio founder even described their plushie as a stimulating sidekick so parents, “don’t feel like you have to be sitting them in front of a TV.”

So, whether it’s a foul-mouth, a blabbermouth, or just a feeble replacement for real friends, we don’t encourage using Artificial Intelligence in children’s toys—unless we ever make it to a point where they can be used safely, privately, securely, and even then, sparingly.

How to stay safe

AI-powered toys are coming, like it or not. But being the first or the cutest doesn’t mean they’re safe. The lesson history keeps teaching us is this: oversight, privacy, and a healthy dose of skepticism are the best defenses parents have.

  • Turn off what you can. If the toy has a removable AI component, consider disabling it when you’re not able to supervise directly.
  • Read the privacy policy. Yes, I knowall of it. Look for what will be recorded, stored, and potentially shared. Pay particular attention to sensitive data, like voice recordings, video recordings (if the toy has a camera), and location data.
  • Limit connectivity. Avoid toys that require constant Wi-Fi or cloud interaction if possible.
  • Monitor conversations. Regularly check in with your kids about what the toy says and supervise play where practical.
  • Keep personal info private. Teach kids to never share their names, addresses, or family details, even with their plush friend.
  • Trust your instincts. If a toy seems to cross boundaries or interfere with natural play, don’t be afraid to step in or simply say no.

We don’t just report on privacy—we offer you the option to use it.

Privacy risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep your online privacy yours by using Malwarebytes Privacy VPN.

New data shows gay and bi folk have shorter life expectancies than straight people

3 février 2026 à 17:10

A new data analysis report from the Office for National Statistics has shown that gay, lesbian and bisexual people typically have shorter life expectancies than heterosexual people.

The results found that gay and bisexual men lived on average 1.2 years less than straight men, while lesbian and bisexual women lived 0.9 years less than straight women.

This marks the first time the ONS has estimated life expectancy by sexual orientation for England and Wales, following orientation being included in the national census in 2021.

READ MORE: Drug and alcohol deaths significantly higher among queer people, study finds

The ONS has confirmed that it cannot determine if sexual orientation is the driver of the difference in life expectancy at this time.

It follows worrying data released this week which found that one in six children who died by suicide in England between April 2019 and March 2025 were LGBTQ+.

The figures, obtained by QueerAF via a Freedom of Information request to the National Child Mortality Database, showed that 107 out of the 647 children who died by suicide during that time were LGBTQ+, with 46 being transgender.

Readers affected by the issues raised in this story are encouraged to contact Samaritans free on 116 123 (www.samaritans.org) or Mind on 0300 123 3393 (www.mind.org.uk). Readers in the US are encouraged to contact the National Suicide Prevention Line on 1-800-273-8255.

The post New data shows gay and bi folk have shorter life expectancies than straight people appeared first on PinkNews | Latest lesbian, gay, bi and trans news | LGBTQ+ news.

❌
❌