Outils pour utilisateurs

Outils du site


dns-blocklist-en

Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente
Prochaine révision
Révision précédente
dns-blocklist-en [2019/02/12 10:07]
sebsauvage [Linux / MacOSX]
dns-blocklist-en [2019/02/14 08:03]
sebsauvage [FAQ]
Ligne 18: Ligne 18:
   * Works in all applications (and not only the browser)   * Works in all applications (and not only the browser)
   * **Under Android, gets rid of almost all advertising and tracking, //including inside applications//​.**   * **Under Android, gets rid of almost all advertising and tracking, //including inside applications//​.**
-  * Can be setup device by device, or on an entire network if configured on your router (pi-Hole, etc.)+  * Can be setup device by device, or on an entire network if configured on your router (pi-Hole, pfSense, etc.)
   * Easy to setup.   * Easy to setup.
   * Fast.   * Fast.
Ligne 148: Ligne 148:
     * Blokada and DNS66 are equally good. Blokada are some more features, like notifications when a domain is blocked, and whitelists. I did not try //​DNSFilter//​.     * Blokada and DNS66 are equally good. Blokada are some more features, like notifications when a domain is blocked, and whitelists. I did not try //​DNSFilter//​.
   * //Why use 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1 ?//   * //Why use 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1 ?//
-    * 0.0.0.0 is a non-routable address. It will fail immediately. Which is not the case of 127.0.0.1 which adds some latency.+    * 0.0.0.0 is a valid, but non-routable address. It will fail immediately. Which is not the case of 127.0.0.1 which adds some latency.
   * //Why not add list X ?//   * //Why not add list X ?//
     * //​[[https://​github.com/​EnergizedProtection/​block|Energized]] ?//     * //​[[https://​github.com/​EnergizedProtection/​block|Energized]] ?//
dns-blocklist-en.txt · Dernière modification: 2019/02/14 08:03 par sebsauvage